Monday, January 28, 2013

Starting your year in a positive mind frame



1. Make a conscious effort to take a lunch break A change of scenery will do your productivity a world of good
2. Tell people what you want
3. Stop saying no to yourself and instead start saying no to others – you can’t be everything to everybody
4. Bringing your lunch from home will save you money
5. Attend networking functions that will leave with a spring in your step, new connections and pumped full of that one of a kind energy
6. Make your workplace a bit more sparkly, it makes a difference! Perhaps a new mouse pad, a photo from home or some fancy new folders will do the trick
7. Create a vision board for the year – it doesn’t have to be hard. Just make yourself think about what you want to achieve this year; cut out some pictures or simply make a list. Vision Boards Rock
8.Time your work so that you have plenty of time for you
9. Stop negative self-talk
10. Be present in the moment, practice mindfulness 
11. As Oprah said – “Surround yourself with people that will only lift you higher” 
12. Trust your gut instincts - If it doesn’t feel right, it isn’t!

Friday, January 25, 2013

2013


Welcome to the new year, may it be a good one!


Networking is no longer just for sales people or when you’re looking for a new job. 

Your personal network is becoming a more and more valuable asset in developing your career

or business. 

What are your top networking tips, what skills do you equip yourself with that you use every day?


Networking does not have to involve sales pitches or business cards being thrust in your face. 

It’s about making real connections and finding out how you can help one another. 

Where do you feel like you belong.?

Friday, October 26, 2012

Women entrepreneurs startup


Start-ups led by women in the US use a third less capital than those led by men, according to US venture capital firm Illuminate Ventures. This has to be good news for ever-frugal seed investors in emerging businesses – and also good news for a new Australian offshoot of the business accelerator program, Springboard Enterprises.
The program was started in the US in 2000 and aims to help female entrepreneurs attract funding for their businesses. It has just launched in Australia, with the first round of applications now open.
More than 500 early-stage companies have participated in the US program, which has helped raise more than $US5.5 billion ($A5.3 billion) for participants.
An early alumnus of the program was Chicago-based entrepreneur and angel investor Lauren Flanagan. Through the program's coaching on how to speak the language of investors, she was able to raise $US23 million for her then business WebWare Corporation, a "software-as-a-service" company that offered software on a subscription basis, similar to the cloud computing model that predominates today. 
She now runs BELLE Capital, a venture capital fund based in the US midwest, is managing partner of Phenomenelle Angels Fund and chief executive of strategic advisory business SCIO Corp.
'Good old boys' disadvantage
Flanagan says the Springboard program helps bridge the gap between scalable businesses that are run by women and the investment community.
“It's often difficult for women to raise capital because of a lack of access to the 'good old boys' network,” she says.
She says the community Springboard participants gain access to is just as valuable as the entrée it delivers to the venture capital world.
“It's hard to be a CEO as a woman with no peer network, so having a peer network is worth even more than the funding," she says. "We say Springboard is a bit like the Hotel California – you can check out but you can't really leave because of the peer community.”
Flanagan says the coaching Springboard participants receive helps them to tell their story so investors can understand their business, figure out how they can make money from the enterprise and understand how founders have tried to de-risk their enterprises.
Commenting on the research cited above that shows women are more efficient with the use of capital, she says she suspects it is because women are able to do more with less or because they are more frugal generally.
Australian involvement
One of the Australian sponsors of the Springboard program is professional services firm Grant Thornton, which is also a sponsor of the US program. Paul Gooley is Grant Thornton's Australian national head of corporate finance and also a board member of Springboard's Australian franchise. He says the program helps young companies become commercially viable.
“Many businesses fail in that capital-constrained part of the investment cycle. Springboard helps bridge the gap from a business idea to commercialisation,” he says.
Grant Thornton is providing financial assistance to the program, although Gooley declined to say how much, as well as marketing and public relations support. It will also offer participants help in developing their financial reporting.
Why it's needed
Melissa Widner is a partner at venture capital firm Seapoint Ventures and co-founder of Head Over Heels, a network for female entrepreneurs. She cites a study by Dow Jones called Women at the Wheel: Do Female Executives Drive Start-Up Success? as a key reason why an initiative such as Springboard is needed. The research found that of all venture-capital backed companies, only 1.3 per cent are led by women.
“We need to focus on getting the 1.3 per cent figure up," says Widner. "We know that women are starting companies but they're not growing them because they don't have the same access to networks.”
Participants in the Springboard program will typically be looking to raise between $500,000 and $10 million. Businesses that go through the program generally come from the worlds of technology, new media and biotechnology.
These are the sectors where Springboard in the US has a track record. Although Springboard's capability in the US is primarily in these areas, it will also accept applications from female entrepreneurs with growth businesses from other sectors that are seeking capital. If those applications are successful, Springboard will then find investors who understand and are best matched to that business and their industry.
Plenty of interest
Flanagan says that despite the venture capital landscape being in its worst state for 10 years, investors associated with the US Springboard network have already expressed interest in investing in Australian early-stage ventures, as have investors from the Asia-Pacific region.
Australian investors already involved with Springboard's Australia arm include Investec, One Ventures, Starfish Ventures, Foundry, Right Click Capital, Anacacia Capital and AFG Venture Group.
Springboard participants also receive support after capital raising. For instance, they can tap into the network to get advice about how to establish a great board or how to get good legal advice.
The program aims to attract 20 participants in its first year, and 40 in its second. So far nine businesses have started the application process.
To qualify, companies must have a profitable market opportunity with competitive advantage, a track record of milestone achievement, a woman in a senior position with a significant equity stake, and a credible management team or ability to attract one. They must also be based in or have significant operations in Australia.
Companies that apply will undergo a rigorous screening process before being selected to participate in the accelerator program. Applications close December 15.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/small-business/startup/funding-springboard-to-boost-female-entrepreneurs-20121022-280cl.html#ixzz2AObwRnbj


Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Senior Bonds


After covered bonds and deposits, the next safest major bank investment is a “senior-ranking” but unsecured bond, rated “AA-”. Today this pays a return of about 4.3 per cent, which is also better than the average deposit.
Like covered bonds, these senior bonds are not easy to access as they are traded in the wholesale market and require minimum investments of $500,000. Two ways to tap into them are through a managed fund that focuses on fixed income, or via a broker like FIIG, which breaks bonds up into smaller chunks.
In the past year, Westpac, ANZ Banking Group and National Australia Bank have listed on the ASX $4 billion worth of “subordinated bonds”, which rank behind senior creditors but ahead of everyone else. These are not to be confused with hybrids, which give banks the option of not paying you dividends, have ultra-long if not perpetual terms, and convert into equity under adverse scenarios. The new ASX subordinated bonds have fixed maturities and legally binding payment obligations. They currently offer interest rates around 6 per cent.

Saturday, October 13, 2012

What are covered bonds?


The safest of all bank investments is a “covered bond”, which is secured by a specifically identified pool of assets. If the bank goes bust, you have recourse to these assets ahead of anyone, including depositors. In fact, the “AAA” covered bond rating is higher than the bank’s “AA-“ rating.
While covered bonds may have a five-year term, you can trade in and out of them every day. They are bought and sold in the liquid “wholesale” bond market, and settled via a platform called Austraclear, which the Australian Stock Exchange owns. And, like a variable or fixed-term deposit, you can get “floating” or fixed covered bonds.
A fixed covered bond pays the same coupon over its life. The variable option provides a predetermined margin above a variable benchmark that is reset every quarter. This benchmark broadly tracks the RBA’s cash rate, and is called the 90-day bank bill swap rate. Today it is around 3.2 per cent. CBA’s variable rate covered bond currently pays 3.9 per cent, which is slightly better than the average bank deposit.
There has been a striking compression in the cost of bank bonds. When CBA issued its first covered bond in January, it was required to pay investors a margin of 1.75 per cent above the bank bill rate. Today the same bond offers a margin of only 0.7 per cent. While incoming investors are receiving lower returns, the original ones made terrific capital gains through an increase in the bond’s price as CBA’s perceived risks declined. This highlights a distinction from normal deposits. Whereas bank deposits never get “revalued”, bonds are repriced every day based on investors’ assessments of the institution’s creditworthiness.

Friday, September 21, 2012

WHERE DO THE MILLIONAIRES LIVE?

Asia-Pacific has overtaken North America as home to the most millionaires for the first time, boosted by a rise in the number of wealthy in China and Japan, a report released on Wednesday showed.

The region had 3.37 million high net worth individuals (HNWIs) in 2011 compared to North America's 3.35 million, a study jointly published by consulting firm Capgemini and RBC Wealth Management found.

Europe possessed 3.17 million HNWIs, which are defined as those having investable assets of $1 million or more excluding their primary residence and luxury possessions including art.

"Asia-Pacific is now home to more high net worth individuals than any other region for the first time," Barend Janssens, head of emerging markets for RBC, told a press conference in Singapore.

Asia-Pacific overtook Europe in 2010 to take second place and a strong growth in the millionaire population -- particularly in Japan and China -- coupled with a fall in the number of the rich in North America led to the region taking first, Janssens said.

"The most significant finding is that Asia-Pacific's population of high net worth individuals grew at a rate of 1.6 percent in 2011, twice the rate of the global population of 0.8 percent," he said.

"This is driven by growth in Japan of up to 4.8 percent and China of up to 5.2 percent."

Japanese formed the bulk of the HNWIs in the Asia-Pacific, constituting 54.1 percent of the total regional population of the rich.

China and Australia ranked second and third at 16.7 percent and 5.3 percent respectively.

Together, the three countries accounted for 76.1 percent of HNWIs in the region.

Despite hosting the most HNWIs, Asia-Pacific still lagged behind in terms of total investable wealth at $10.7 trillion, compared to $11.4 trillion for North America.

International factors such as the eurozone crisis coupled with domestic issues, including, sinking property prices and inflation bit into the pockets of millionaires, said Claire Sauvanaud, vice president of Capgemini Asia-Pacific.

International capital outflows from the region also held back its rich, with China and India seeing $1.6 billion and $4.09 billion in foreign institutional investor funds leave their markets last year, data showed.

But Sauvanaud said the region -- led by economic powerhouses China and India -- would be able to weather the problems.

"The diverse nature of Asia-Pacific exports and economies means the outlook for the region as a whole remains very strong," she stated.

"China and India are the ones to watch. Despite their challenges they are likely to remain two of the fastest-growing economies in the world in the very near future."

Thursday, September 6, 2012

How competitive is Australia


The World Economic Forum (WEF) has updated its list of how countries around the world stack up on its competitiveness scale.
In The Global Competitiveness Index 2012-2013: Strengthening Recovery by Raising Productivity, the WEF “define[s] competitiveness as the set of institutions, policies, and factors that determine the level of productivity of a country”.
The 12 categories the Forum measures uses to decide rankings are: institutions, infrastructure, macroeconomics, health and primary education, goods and market efficiency, higher education and training, labour market efficiency, technological readiness, financial market development, market size, business sophistication, and innovation.
On the updated scale, Australia comes in at No. 20, holding steady at it’s ranking last year, which was down four spots on the year before that. The top 10:
  1. Switzerland (No. 1 last year)
  2. Singapore (No. 2 last year)
  3. Finland (No. 4 last year)
  4. Sweden (No. 3 last year)
  5. Netherlands (No. 7 last year)
  6. Germany (No. 6 last year)
  7. United States (No. 5 last year)
  8. United Kingdom (No. 10 last year)
  9. Hong Kong (No. 11 last year)
  10. Japan (No. 9 last year)
The WEF highlights the strong performance of Asia-Pacific countries in the 2012-2013 survey, noting that six countries from the region made the top 10 (Singapore, Hong Kong, Japan, Taiwan, the Republic of Korea and Australia).
On Australia it says: “After losing four positions to faster-improving economies last year, Australia retains its rank of 20th and score of 5.1, just behind Korea. Among the country’s most notable advantages is its efficient and well-developed financial system (8th), supported by a banking sector that counts as among the most stable and sound in the world, ranked 5th. The country earns very good marks in education, placing 15th in primary education and 11th in higher education and training.
“Australia’s macroeconomic situation is satisfactory in the current context (26th). Despite repeated budget deficits, its public debt amounts to a low 23 percent of GDP, the third lowest ratio among the advanced economies, behind only Estonia and Luxembourg.
The main area of concern for Australia is the rigidity of its labour market
(42nd). Indeed, the business community cites the labour regulations as being the most problematic factor for doing business, ahead of red tape. In addition, although the situation has improved since last year, transport infrastructure continues to suffer bottlenecks owing to the boom in commodity exports.”
Among Australia’s top 10 trading partners for goods and services in 2011 (as defined by the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade) the leaderboard stacked up as follows:
  1. China (No. 29 in WEF rankings)
  2. Japan (No. 10)
  3. Republic of Korea (No. 19)
  4. India (No. 59)
  5. United States (No. 7)
  6. United Kingdom (No. 8)
  7. New Zealand (No. 23)
  8. Taiwan (No. 13)
  9. Singapore (No. 2)
  10. Thailand (No. 38)
As for the world’s 10 least competitive countries in descending order out of the 144 nations ranked by WEF, Burundi headed the pack:
  1. Burundi
  2. Sierra Leone
  3. Haiti
  4. Guinea
  5. Yemen
  6. Chad
  7. Mozambique
  8. Lesotho
  9. Timor-Leste
  10. Swaziland